A Modest Monument

Sign welcoming visitors to the Church.  

Unfortunately last Thursday I did not make it to the Church. I have quite a few assignments in my other classes right now, and so I was unable to dedicate a whole day to my research. However, I was able to do some work at home, and I managed to review a few more entries to ensure their accuracy. Due to the small amount of work that I have completed since the last post, I will highlight a specific monument type that I encountered a lot during monument recording. Out of 54 monuments recorded in all, the slant faced monument with a plaster top made up 10 of them. This equates to about 18.5 % of all of the Victorian Era monuments in the cemetery. This is a substantial portion of the monuments and is second in quantity only to the simple, concrete only slant-faced markers, marking pioneer burials. They are equal in quantity to domed tablets, which are made of a greater and often more expensive variety of stone.

Earliest dated monument of this type. 

This monument is one of the simplest monuments in the cemetery, and usually does not have any motifs engraved upon it. There are two exceptions to this, wherein two Latin crosses are engraved on either side of the inscription. The earliest date at which this type of monument appears is 1876, marking the burial of Baby Michell. This type of monument is used for both children and adults,

One of only two of this type of monument that had any motif
decoration upon it. 

although they differ in size accordingly. When marking the burial of children, these monuments are not as wide horizontally as the adult monuments are. Although I was unable to take measurements at the time of monument recording due to not having a tape

One of only two of this type of monument that had any motif
decoration upon it. 

measure, I intend to do this on Thursday. Interestingly, for this monument, the burial trend noted in Ross Bay and York Cemetery by Buckham (as spoken of in my first post), is consistent. Not one child's monument is the same size as an adult monument, and each child's monument is only commemorating one child, even if said child was too young for a name. Some, although not all, children's monuments had smaller ground ledgers as well.

The modesty of this monument is notable. While in the pictures, it appears to be made of a material mimicking a higher grade stone, it is actually a base of concrete with some kind of plaster layered on top. It is within this plaster that the inscription is engraved. On most of the monuments, the plaster is cracking or chipping off. A picture below shows a side view of one of these monuments, illustrating clearly its dual composition. Also note how chipped the plaster is on the edge. It seems to me that this monument may be so popular because of its modesty. Despite the Victorian era being marked by elaborate monuments, one of my hypotheses from the

Side view revealing the dual composition and tendency
to chip. 

beginning of this research project was the possibility that monuments in a Christian cemetery were more likely to display less extravagance so typical of the era. This is possibly due to Christian beliefs that value modesty, both material and behavioural. Of course, it may also relate to the presumably cheaper cost of the monument, or may be a combination of both factors.

I apologise for the late post this week, it has been a busy time for me! I will be posting again this week, probably on Saturday or Sunday, providing updates for my progress to occur on Thursday.